State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 384.]
THE STATE EX REL. ROY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-176.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2305—Submitted June 22, 1999—Decided September 8, 1999.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD06-741. __________________ William D. Snyder & Associates and John Lesko, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.
Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., and Cynthia C. Felson, for appellee Henry J. Kaiser Company. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
DOUGLAS, J., dissents.
RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.