E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.
E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 317.]
CITY OF EAST LIVERPOOL, APPELLANT, v. COLUMBIANA COUNTY BUDGET COMMISSION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm., 1999-Ohio-168.] Taxation—Income tax—R.C. 5747.53 and 5747.63—Apportioning Undivided Local Government Fund and Undivided Local Government Revenue Assistance Fund—Decision of Board of Tax Appeals reversed on authority of Lancaster v. Fairfield Cty. Budget Comm. (No. 98-1857—Submitted July 28, 1999—Decided September 8, 1999.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 97-D-1516 and 97-D-1517. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is now before the court upon an appeal as of right. John R. Varanese, for appellant. Robert L. Herron, Columbiana County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew A. Beech, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Columbiana County Budget Commission. Alfred E. Schrader and Scot A. Stevenson, for appellees Columbiana County Townships. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 2} We reverse this decision on the authority of Lancaster v. Fairfield Cty. Budget Comm. (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 137, 712 N.E.2d 719. Decision reversed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Taxation—Income tax—R.C. 5747.53 and 5747.63—Apportioning Undivided Local Government Fund and Undivided Local Government Revenue Assistance Fund—Decision of Board of Tax Appeals reversed on authority of Lancaster v. Fairfield Cty. Budget Comm.