[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




                  OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PETROFF.
             [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff, 

.]
               (No. 98-2641—Submitted and decided July 30, 1999.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the application for
reinstatement by respondent Mark G. Petroff, a.k.a. Mark Gregory Petroff,
Attorney 

 last known business address in Elyria, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 28, 1999, wherein
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of
one year, with full credit for time served under the interim suspension entered in
Supreme Court case No. 98-354, finds that respondent has substantially complied
with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Mark G. Petroff, a.k.a. Mark
Gregory Petroff, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of
Ohio.
        {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent
bear the costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff (1999), 

, 

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________