Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls
Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 1207.]
AKRON HYDROELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls, 1999-Ohio-150.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-2122—Submitted June 9, 1999—Decided July 28, 1999.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 18849. __________________ Richard K. Wilcox, for appellant.
Virgil Arrington, Jr., Deputy Law Director, for appellee city of Cuyahoga Falls.
Brouse & McDowell and J. Bruce Hunsicker, for appellee Powerhouse at Water’s Edge, Ltd. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.