State v. Lewis
State v. Lewis
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 632.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LEWIS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Lewis, 1999-Ohio-327.]
Criminal law—Motor vehicles—Traffic offenses—Driving while intoxicated— Administrative license suspension—Reinstatement fee of former R.C.
4511.191(L)(2) does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Uskert. (No. 98-2376—Submitted May 18, 1999—Decided June 16, 1999.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 19006. __________________ Lawrence J. Cook, for appellant. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm on authority of State v. Uskert (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 593, 709 N.E.2d 1200. The cause is remanded to the trial court to reinstate the original $280 Administrative License Suspension reinstatement fee that the trial court ordered be applied to any reinstatement fees due on the DUI suspension.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Uskert (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 593, 709 N.E.2d 1200. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.