Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

Waite v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Waite v. Progressive Ins. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 9, 1999
1999 Ohio 413; 85 Ohio St. 3d 1226

Waite v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 St.3d 1226.]

WAITE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Waite v. Progressive Ins. Co., 1999-Ohio-413.]

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-1462—Submitted May 4, 1999—Decided June 9, 1999.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Huron County, No. H-97-036. __________________ Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., Michael T. Murray, Steven C. Bechtel, Dennis E. Murray, Sr. and W. Patrick Murray, for appellants.

Meyers, Hentemann & Rea Co., L.P.A., Henry A. Hentemann and J.

Michael Creagan, for appellee.

Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, urging that R.C. 3937.18(H) be found unconstitutional, for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Mark W. Ruf and Jean M. McQuillan, urging that R.C. 3937.18 be found unconstitutional, for amicus curiae, Cleveland Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Judith L. French and Kimberly L.

Charles, Assistant Attorneys General, urging that R.C. 3937.18(H) be found constitutional, for amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., and John J. Kulewicz, urging that R.C. 3937.18(H) be found constitutional, for amicus curiae, Ohio Insurance Institute. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

COOK, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.