State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 377.]
THE STATE EX REL. SPINKS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-393.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1444—Submitted February 23, 1999—Decided April 28, 1999.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD03-326. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Gerald H. Waterman and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.