Sherrill v. Harroff
Sherrill v. Harroff
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 339.]
SHERRILL ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HARROFF, APPELLEE, ET AL.; KNOEDLER, APPELLANT. [Cite as Sherrill v. Harroff, 1999-Ohio-269.]
Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie. (No. 98-2651—Submitted March 9, 1999—Decided April 21, 1999.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County, No. 96-CO-36. __________________ D. Barry Dickson, for appellee Ronnie Dean Harroff.
A. Robert Steiskal, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 437, 705 N.E.2d 318.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.