State v. Saylor
State v. Saylor
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 1205.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SAYLOR, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Saylor, 1999-Ohio-453.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed—Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. (Nos. 98-2066 and 98-2067—Submitted March 10, 1999—Decided March 31, 1999.)
APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA98-03-053. __________________ John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel, First Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and John M. Holcomb, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Richard E. Saylor, pro se. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed in case No. 98-2066. {¶ 2} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified in case No. 98-2067.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 3} I would accept this case and require that the matter be briefed and set for oral argument. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.