Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar

Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 13, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
84 Ohio St. 3d 372; 704 N.E.2d 236
Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Because respondent has terminated his probate practice and because in this instance his conduct did not result in improper gain to him or financial harm to his client, we impose a lesser sanction than the board recommended. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the entire six months stayed. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.