Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wolosin
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Foster (Ohio 2001)
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. Foster (Ohio 2001)
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ryan (Ohio 2000)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Ryan (Ohio 2000)
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Reis (Ohio 1999)
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Reis (Ohio 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Absent any mitigating circumstances, appropriation of client funds and a pattern of neglecting client interests warrant disbarment. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Armon (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 497, 499-500, 678 N.E.2d 1371, 1373. Given the number of these incidents, the lack of any mitigating evidence, as well as respondent’s failure to comply with our suspension order and cooperate in the disciplinary investigation, disbarment is the only appropriate sanction here. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.