Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nentwick

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nentwick
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 10, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
84 Ohio St. 3d 491; 705 N.E.2d 668

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nentwick

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusions, except the conclusion that in the MacKall matter respondent violated DR 7-102(A)(2) (knowingly advancing a claim or defense unwarranted under existing law), which the board erroneously characterized as “failing to carry out a contract of employment.” We also adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑