State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan

Ohio Supreme Court March 3, 1999

State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan, 84 Ohio St. 3d 529 (Ohio 1999)

705 N.E.2d 1226

Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Corrigan did not have any duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Carroll’s successive petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 271, 667 N.E.2d 391; State ex rel. Luna v. McGimpsey (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 485, 486, 659 N.E.2d 1278, 1278-1279.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan, Judge
Cited By: 37 cases
Status: Published