Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan

State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 3, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
84 Ohio St. 3d 529; 705 N.E.2d 1226

State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Corrigan did not have any duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Carroll’s successive petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 271, 667 N.E.2d 391; State ex rel. Luna v. McGimpsey (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 485, 486, 659 N.E.2d 1278, 1278-1279.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.