State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan
State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan
84 Ohio St. 3d 529; 705 N.E.2d 1226
State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Corrigan did not have any duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Carroll’s successive petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 271, 667 N.E.2d 391; State ex rel. Luna v. McGimpsey (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 485, 486, 659 N.E.2d 1278, 1278-1279.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.