Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

State ex rel. Nicastro v. Stralka

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 4, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Grant, Moyer, Pfeifer, Prohibition, Remedy, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney, Writ

84 Ohio St. 3d 1456; 703 N.E.2d 1281; 1999 Ohio LEXIS 47

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Douglas, Acting C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs because prohibition is an improper remedy. Cook, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.