Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boylan
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Siehl (Ohio 2009)
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Paulson (Ohio 2006)
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson (Ohio 1999)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Ford (Ohio 2012)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Hallquist (Ohio 2011)
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Judge (Ohio 2002)
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Judge (Ohio 2002)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson (Ohio 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The sanction of an indefinite suspension from the practice of law “is especially fitting * * * where neglect of a legal matter is coupled with a failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation.” Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 490, 683 N.E.2d 1148, 1149; see, also, Akron Bar Assn. v. Barnett (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 269, 685 N.E.2d 1230. The record establishes that respondent exhibited a cavalier attitude toward both the representation of his client and the ensuing disciplinary investigation. Respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.