Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 24, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
85 Ohio St. 3d 167; 707 N.E.2d 850
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Practicing law while under suspension for failure to meet continuing legal education requirements and pay the imposed fine warranted indefinite suspension in Toledo Bar Assn. v. Christensen (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 71, *168671 N.E.2d 30, and such a sanction is also warranted in this case. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice- of law in Ohio and remains subject to the conditions of our order of June 18, 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.