Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 1999
85 Ohio St. 3d 1411; 706 N.E.2d 792; 1999 Ohio LEXIS 672

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Opinion of the Court

On February 19, 1999, respondent Inza E. Johnson filed an application for reinstatement to the *1412practice of law. Respondent attached to her application a document titled “Objections to the Findings and Recommendation of the Board.” Whereas objections to the findings and recommendations of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline were due no later than September 25, 1997, respondent’s submission of the objections at this time is prohibited by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s application for reinstatement be, and hereby is, stricken.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.