Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

Prather v. Brigano

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 29, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

86 Ohio St. 3d 609; 716 N.E.2d 197

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Clarke v. McFaul, 89436 (4-5-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Hopkins v. State, 89647 (4-16-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State Ex Rel. Irvin v. Off. of Pros. Atty, Unpublished Decision (12-21-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
Moore v. Kochevar, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
Palmer v. Rose, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Smith v. Pavicic, Unpublished Decision (3-19-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
Palmer v. State, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
In re Peterson, 07-Ma-56 (4-5-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Prather v. Brigano (Ohio 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not err in dismissing Prather’s habeas corpus petition. Prather’s speedy-trial claim is not cognizable in habeas corpus. State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287, 288, 685 N.E.2d 1243, 1244. In addition, Prather did not attach his commitment papers to his petition. Tucker v. McAninch (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 423, 696 N.E.2d 595, 596. Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.