Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

State ex rel. Inskeep v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

State ex rel. Inskeep v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 2, 1999 · Because, Cook, Deny, Dismiss, Douglas, Improper, Injunction, Laches, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
86 Ohio St. 3d 1475; 715 N.E.2d 576; 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3090

State ex rel. Inskeep v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of mandamus be, and hereby is, denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., would dismiss the cause. Lundberg Stratton, J., would deny for laches and because the cause is improper for injunction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑