Wilkerson v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court
Wilkerson v. Mitchell, 87 Ohio St. 3d 52 (Ohio 1999)
716 N.E.2d 1157
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Wilkerson v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Wilkerson’s claims challenge the validity and sufficiency of his indictment and are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Shie v. Leonard (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 160, 161, 702 N.E.2d 419, 420. Moreover, Wilkerson’s robbery convictions were based on an indictment expressly charging him with those offenses.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Wilkerson v. Mitchell, Warden
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published