Akron Bar Ass'n v. Snyder
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Herron (Ohio 2004)
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Parker (Ohio 2004)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Treneff (Ohio 2004)
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Lawrence (Ohio 2003)
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. Jones (Ohio 2003)
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Judge (Ohio 2002)
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moushey (Ohio 2002)
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Judge (Ohio 2002)
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. DeLoach (Ohio 2015)
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Scaccia (Ohio 2015)
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. Farah (Ohio 2013)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Ford (Ohio 2012)
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. Woodley (Ohio 2012)
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Church (Ohio 2007)
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Deaton (Ohio 2004)
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Pommeranz (Ohio 2004)
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden (Ohio 2002)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden (Ohio 2002)
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Judge (Ohio 2002)
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. Moushey (Ohio 2002)
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Judge (Ohio 2002)
- Akron Bar Assn. v. Snyder (Ohio 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Neglect of legal matters and a failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation generally warrant an indefinite suspension from the practice of law in Ohio. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Rollins (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 408, 410, 704 N.E.2d 1210, 1211. The board properly noted that the misconduct charged in the complaint occurred in the same period of time as the charges involved in respondent’s previous disciplinary case, which resulted in an indefinite suspension, and that these new charges did not require a significantly different sanction. See, e.g., Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Jaynes (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 245, 246, 611 N.E.2d 807, 808. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio and is ordered to make full restitution to his clients, Shalhoub and Conner, and to the Clients’ Security Fund. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.