Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 10, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

87 Ohio St. 3d 213; 718 N.E.2d 1272

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoskins (Ohio 2008)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bowman (Ohio 2003)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bradley (Ohio 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board, to which respondent concurs. A sanction of at least an indefinite *215suspension is warranted for misconduct that includes violations of DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), and 9-102(B). See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 220, 556 N.E.2d 521; Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp (1990), 48 Ohio St.3d 16, 548 N.E.2d 947. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, and his reinstatement is conditioned on his making restitution of $15,000 to Piazza plus interest at a rate of ten percent per annum from the dates that Piazza gave respondent the checks. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.