Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kinane

Ohio Supreme Court
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kinane, 87 Ohio St. 3d 221 (Ohio 1999)
718 N.E.2d 1279
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kinane

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board but not its recommendation. As we said in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Belock (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 98, 100, 694 N.E.2d 897, 899, “the continuing public confidence in the judicial system and the bar requires that the strictest discipline be imposed in misappropriation cases.” Respondent’s pattern of betraying the trust and confidence of clients was particularly egregious since he was a public defender.

Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published