Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

State ex rel. Graves v. Ney

State ex rel. Graves v. Ney
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 24, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
87 Ohio St. 3d 234; 718 N.E.2d 1289
State ex rel. Graves v. Ney

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Original actions for extraordinary relief like a writ of mandamus must be commenced by filing a complaint or petition rather than a motion. See State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 521, 522, 700 N.E.2d 1258, 1259.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.