State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp., 87 Ohio St. 3d 237 (Ohio 1999)
719 N.E.2d 528
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp.
Opinion of the Court
Mandamus will not issue where the relator has a plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E.2d 225. For this reason, the failure to pursue an adequate
Under R.C. 4123.511(B)(1), claimant could have appealed the bureau’s order to a commission district hearing officer. The bureau’s order, moreover, informed claimant, in highlighted language, of his right and responsibility to appeal if he was dissatisfied with the wage as set. Claimant chose not to appeal.
The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp. Conrad, Admr., Bureau of Workers' Compensation
- Cited By
- 10 cases
- Status
- Published