State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp.
State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp.
Opinion of the Court
Mandamus will not issue where the relator has a plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E.2d 225. For this reason, the failure to pursue an adequate
Under R.C. 4123.511(B)(1), claimant could have appealed the bureau’s order to a commission district hearing officer. The bureau’s order, moreover, informed claimant, in highlighted language, of his right and responsibility to appeal if he was dissatisfied with the wage as set. Claimant chose not to appeal.
The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.