State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell, 87 Ohio St. 3d 259 (Ohio 1999)
719 N.E.2d 545
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. Jackson v. Rose (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 51, 679 N.E.2d 684, 685; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published