Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 1, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

87 Ohio St. 3d 259; 719 N.E.2d 545

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Bradford v. Moore (Ohio 2000)
Bradford v. Moore (Ohio 2000)
State Ex Rel. Waver v. Gallagher, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (Ohio 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. Jackson v. Rose (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 51, 679 N.E.2d 684, 685; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.