State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
87 Ohio St. 3d 259; 719 N.E.2d 545
State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. Jackson v. Rose (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 51, 679 N.E.2d 684, 685; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.