Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell

State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 1, 1999 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
87 Ohio St. 3d 259; 719 N.E.2d 545

State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. Jackson v. Rose (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 51, 679 N.E.2d 684, 685; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.