State v. Landrum

Ohio Supreme Court December 22, 1999

State v. Landrum, 87 Ohio St. 3d 315 (Ohio 1999)

720 N.E.2d 524

Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the court of appeals that Landrum’s application to reopen his appeal was untimely under App.R. 26(B) and that Landrum failed to show “good cause” for the untimely filing. See, also, State v. Fox (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 514, 700 N.E.2d 1253; State v. Wickline (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 369, 371, 658 N.E.2d 1052, 1053.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio v. Landrum
Cited By: 5 cases
Status: Published