State v. Landrum
State v. Landrum
87 Ohio St. 3d 315; 720 N.E.2d 524
State v. Landrum
Opinion of the Court
We agree with the court of appeals that Landrum’s application to reopen his appeal was untimely under App.R. 26(B) and that Landrum failed to show “good cause” for the untimely filing. See, also, State v. Fox (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 514, 700 N.E.2d 1253; State v. Wickline (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 369, 371, 658 N.E.2d 1052, 1053.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.