Ohio Supreme Court, 1999

State v. Landrum

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 22, 1999 · No. 99-994 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

87 Ohio St. 3d 315; 720 N.E.2d 524

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Landrum v. Mitchell (6th Cir. 2010)
Landrum v. Anderson (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2002)
State v. Landrum (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Landrum (Ohio 1999)
State v. Landrum (Ohio 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the court of appeals that Landrum’s application to reopen his appeal was untimely under App.R. 26(B) and that Landrum failed to show “good cause” for the untimely filing. See, also, State v. Fox (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 514, 700 N.E.2d 1253; State v. Wickline (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 369, 371, 658 N.E.2d 1052, 1053.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.