Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 30, 2000
2000 Ohio 226; 89 Ohio St. 3d 496
State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 496.]

THE STATE EX REL. CARTER, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2000-Ohio-226.]

Judgment of court of appeals affirmed. (No. 99-2108—Submitted April 26, 2000—Decided August 30, 2000.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-235. __________________ Paul Mancino, Jr., for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jihad M. Smaili, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant had adequate legal remedies to raise his claims. Moreover, habeas corpus, not mandamus, is the proper action to seek release from prison. See State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 567, 568, 722 N.E.2d 72. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.