[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 520.]

THE STATE EX REL. BLACKSON v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Blackson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2000-Ohio-238.] Complaint for writ of prohibition dismissed on authority of Woods v. Telb and because petitioner has or had an adequate remedy by the filing of a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal. (No. 00-213—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided August 3, 2000.) IN PROHIBITION. __________________ Nelson R. Blackson, pro se. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Todd R. Marti, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents. __________________ {¶ 1} The complaint for a writ of prohibition is dismissed on the authority of Woods v. Telb (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 504, 733 N.E.2d 1103, and because petitioner has or had an adequate remedy by the filing of a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal. See State ex rel. Keenan v. Calabrese (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 176, 177-179, 631 N.E.2d 119, 121-122. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________