State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp.
State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 275.]
THE STATE EX REL. TYRRELL, APPELLANT, v. JAY EM CORPORATION; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp., 2000-Ohio-156.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-2167—Submitted May 23, 2000—Decided July 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1604. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Vincent T. Lombardo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.