State ex rel. Rosso v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Rosso v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 312 (Ohio 2000)
88 Ohio St. 3d 230

State ex rel. Rosso v. Indus. Comm.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 230.]

THE STATE EX REL. ROSSO, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Rosso v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-312.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1150—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-694. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cecille Caluya Harris, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Thompson, Hine & Flory, L.L.P., and J. Kent Breslin, for appellee Geon Company, f.k.a. B.F. Goodrich Company. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.