State ex rel. Peck v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Peck v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 228.]
THE STATE EX REL. PECK, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Peck v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-308.] Workers’ compensation–Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1024—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-446. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas W. Atzberger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation–Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.