State ex rel. Nehez v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Nehez v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 228.]
THE STATE EX REL. NEHEZ, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Nehez v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-309.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1089—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-679. __________________ Robert E. Gross and Scott Coghlan, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cecille Caluya Harris, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.