State v. Sanchez

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Sanchez, 2000 Ohio 261 (Ohio 2000)
88 Ohio St. 3d 16

State v. Sanchez

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 16.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SANCHEZ, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Sanchez, 2000-Ohio-261.] Motion for reconsideration granted on Proposition of Law No. II—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of State v. Dye. (No. 99-998—Submitted December 14, 1999—Decided February 9, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 98-A-0006. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. __________________ Thomas L. Sartini, Ashtabula County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ariana E. Tarighati, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The motion to reconsider the court’s refusal to grant jurisdiction is granted on Proposition of Law No. II. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Dye (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 323, 695 N.E.2d 763. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Motion for reconsideration granted on Proposition of Law No. II—Court of appeals' judgment reversed on authority of State v. Dye.