State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co.
State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 452.]
THE STATE EX REL. COBB, APPELLANT, v. R.O. WETZ TRANSPORTATION COMPANY; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co., 2000-Ohio-461.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-876 – Submitted November 16, 1999 – Decided January 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-103. __________________ Lancione Law Offices and David Lancione, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission to comply with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.