Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Slack

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Slack
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 22, 2000 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
88 Ohio St. 3d 274; 725 N.E.2d 631
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Slack

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we do not accept the board’s recommendation of indefinite suspension. Based on the continuing course of misconduct and respondent’s multiple felony convictions, we believe that a harsher sanction is warranted. Therefore, respondent is permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.