Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

Newkirk v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 10, 2000 · Cook, Stratton

88 Ohio St. 3d 402; 727 N.E.2d 592

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Brittain v. Progressive Pref. Ins., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
Nichols v. Progressive Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (6-18-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
Newkirk v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. (Ohio 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 252-255, 725 N.E.2d 261, 267-269.

I do not believe that Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103, correctly disposes of appellant’s second proposition of law that challenges the validity of a named-driver exclusion in a contract of insurance. However, to the extent that the majority considers Moore applicable, I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my opinion in Moore. Id., 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.