Moroney v. Annis
Ohio Supreme Court
Moroney v. Annis, 88 Ohio St. 3d 506 (Ohio 2000)
727 N.E.2d 1287
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Moroney v. Annis
Concurring Opinion
concurring. I concur for the reasons set forth in my concurrence in Stickney v. State Farm Mut Auto. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 504, 727 N.E.2d 1286.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 252-255, 725 N.E.2d 261, 267-269, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33-36, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103-105.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Moroney v. Annis State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published