Moroney v. Annis
Moroney v. Annis
Concurring Opinion
concurring. I concur for the reasons set forth in my concurrence in Stickney v. State Farm Mut Auto. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 504, 727 N.E.2d 1286.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 252-255, 725 N.E.2d 261, 267-269, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33-36, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103-105.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.