Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Holcomb v. State Farm Insurance Companies

Ohio Supreme Court
Holcomb v. State Farm Insurance Companies, 88 Ohio St. 3d 537 (Ohio 2000)
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Holcomb v. State Farm Insurance Companies

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Concurring Opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring. I concur for the reasons set forth in my concurrence in Stickney v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 504, 727 N.E.2d 1286.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 252-*538255, 725 N.E.2d 261, 267-269, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33-36, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103-105.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Holcomb, Admr., and v. State Farm Insurance Companies, and
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
↑