Thompson v. Olinn

Ohio Supreme Court June 7, 2000

Thompson v. Olinn, 89 Ohio St. 3d 94 (Ohio 2000)

Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Concurring in Part

Douglas, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I would grant the motion for reconsideration and allow the discretionary appeal. I would then set a briefing schedule and assign the case for oral argument. I would not, at this. juncture, remand the cause to the trial court.

Opinion of the Court

The motion for reconsideration is granted.

*95The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: Thompson, a Minor v. Olinn, a Minor Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published