Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

State ex rel. North v. Conrad

State ex rel. North v. Conrad
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 21, 2000 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
89 Ohio St. 3d 201; 729 N.E.2d 751

State ex rel. North v. Conrad

Opinion of the Court

*202The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur and dissent.

Concurring in Part

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

concurring and dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause for reconsideration, but would not mandate the application of Gay relief.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑