Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

State ex rel. Whittenberger v. Clarke

State ex rel. Whittenberger v. Clarke
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 21, 2000 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
89 Ohio St. 3d 207; 729 N.E.2d 756

State ex rel. Whittenberger v. Clarke

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A writ of mandamus will not be issued when there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. R.C. 2731.05; State ex rel. Natl. Electrical Contractors Assn., Ohio Conference v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 179, 183, 699 N.E.2d 64, 67. As the court of appeals held, Whittenberger had an adequate remedy by appeal to challenge the common pleas court’s imposition of court costs.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.