Bradford v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court
Bradford v. Moore, 90 Ohio St. 3d 75 (Ohio 2000)
734 N.E.2d 828
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Bradford v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because a “claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction.” State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 259, 260, 719 N.E.2d 545, 546; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bradford v. Moore, Warden
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published