Bradford v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court
Bradford v. Moore, 90 Ohio St. 3d 75 (Ohio 2000)
734 N.E.2d 828
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Bradford v. Moore
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because a “claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction.” State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 259, 260, 719 N.E.2d 545, 546; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Bradford v. Moore, Warden
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published