Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

Bradford v. Moore

Bradford v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 20, 2000 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
90 Ohio St. 3d 75; 734 N.E.2d 828

Bradford v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because a “claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction.” State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 259, 260, 719 N.E.2d 545, 546; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.