Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

State ex rel. Reese v. Lisotto

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 20, 2000 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

90 Ohio St. 3d 77; 734 N.E.2d 831

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Mootispaw, Unpublished Decision (4-02-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State ex rel. Reese v. Lisotto (Ohio 2000)
Snyder Elevators, Inc. v. Baker (Ind. Ct. App. 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Lisotto had no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Reese’s second and third petitions for postconviction relief. State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 301, 302, 714 N.E.2d 924, 924-925. And Judge Lisotto’s 1997 judgment entry denying Reese postconviction relief satisfied the requirement for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Gause v. Zaleski (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 614, 615, 710 N.E.2d 684, 686.1

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

. We also deny appellant’s motion to supplement the record.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.